Skip to main content

AICCTU Condemns the Statement of Chairman of Larsen & Toubro (L&T) that employees should work 90 hours a week

AICCTU Condemns the Statement of Chairman of Larsen & Toubro (L&T) that employees should work 90 hours a week and demands strict enforcement of the 8 hour day and 48 hour week

AICCTU strongly condemns the recent statements made by SN Subrahmanyan, Chairman of Larsen & Toubro (L&T) that employees should work 90 hours a week and even on Sundays. Few months ago, the Co-founder of Infosys Narayana Murthy had said that in order to increase work productivity in the nation and increase India's competitiveness, young Indians should put in up to 70 hours a week of labor. Other business titans like Bhavish Aggarwal of Ola, Sajjan Jindal of Jindal Steel Works Group publicly supported the proposal for a 70-hour work week. 

Emboldened by the Modi government's brazenly pro-Corporate policies and strengthening Corporate Raj under the Modi regime, corporate houses are freely issuing such statements that show utter disregard  towards the working class, including their physical and mental well-being. Moreover, the Corporates also have illegally made 12 hour work a norm, particularly for contract workers.

The 8 hour work day is a product of great struggle, one for which lives were sacrificed. India’s legalised 8 hour working day came with the 1946 Amendment to the Factories Act of 1934 – a result of the Bill introduced by Dr Babasaheb Ambedkar as Labour Member in the Viceroy’s Executive Council. 

One of the serious impacts of long working hours is on the health of the workers. Several studies have linked long working shifts to negative impact on general health, including problems with cognitive anxiety, musculoskeletal disorders, sleep disturbance, and stress. There is also the associated fatigue created by excess working hours that “also spreads to other organs affecting the neuromuscular mechanism leading to reduced sensory perception, less attention, reducing the ability of discrimination, weakening the muscles, reducing the gland secretions, reducing the heartbeat or irregular heartbeat, and dilating the blood vessels”. There is enough evidence now that that longer working hours badly affect the occupational health of workers. 


It is important to note that not only does working longer hours not ensure increased productivity, but in fact reduces productivity. Data confirms that shorter working days and better pay improves productivity and even profits, and several countries are in fact moving towards a 6 hour work day. 


India already has one of the most hardworking workforces in the world. The International Labour Organization reports that, in 2023, Indians will have the longest average workweek among the world's ten largest economies. Only Qatar, Congo, Lesotho, Bhutan, Gambia, and the United Arab Emirates have higher average working hours than India, which comes in at number seven in the world. In fact, due to the low rate of wages, most Indians are compelled to work 2 jobs just to make ends meet. 


The stark disparity in the CEO-worker wage gap in India must also be noted, where in large corporations CEOs earn 500 to 800 times the median employee remuneration. In fact, the Chairman of L&T received a salary of ₹51 crore in 2023-24, which amounts to 534.57 times the median salary of L&T employees.

The gendered impact of increased working hours must also be acknowledged. The statement made by the L&T Chairman, “What do you do sitting at home? How long could you stare at your wives?” highlights the invisibilization of women workers. Women not only contribute through paid labor but also shoulder the burden of unpaid domestic work at home, leaving them with virtually no leisure time. Extending working hours would only widen the disparity between male and female employees, exacerbating existing inequalities.

The Directive Principles of State Policy mandates that “the State shall, in particular, direct its policy towards securing that the health and strength of workers, men and women are not abused” and that “the State shall make provision for securing just and humane conditions of work.”


While condemning such statements by Corporates, AICCTU calls upon the Union and all State Governments to enforce laws governing working hours strictly, ensuring that workers are not compelled to exceed the legally mandated limit of 48 hours per week, and take further steps must to protect the health and lives of workers, upholding their fundamental rights and dignity.

*AICCTU HQ*

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Nehru: Past, Present, and Future

  Based on a speech/talk in Telugu by Dr. Devaraju Maharaju  Some people say Nehru belongs to the past. Personally, I believe he belongs not only to the past but to the present and the future as well. Building a nation requires immense effort and sacrifice — and Nehru demonstrated both through his life. His life stands as an ideal not just for the older generation, but for today's youth and generations yet to come. I hold this belief firmly. He was a visionary, an atheist, a rationalist — but setting all of that aside, there is one thing that must be spoken of without fail: Scientific Temper . The man who coined the term "scientific temper" and gave it to the world was Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru. This phrase is now used globally, and people must remember that it was Nehru who gave us those words. The Roots of Scientific Thought in India Did scientific temper begin with Nehru? Not quite. India was actually home to the world's earliest materialists. It was India tha...
Post a Comment
Read more

Unveiling the "Real Majority" of India

Unveiling the "Real Majority": Divya Dwivedi’s Critique of the Hindu Majority Narrative * In contemporary Indian discourse, the notion of a "Hindu majority" is often taken as an unassailable fact, with official statistics frequently citing approximately 80% of India’s population as Hindu. This framing shapes political campaigns, cultural narratives, and even national identity. However, philosopher and professor at IIT Delhi, Divya Dwivedi, challenges this narrative in her provocative and incisive work, arguing that the "Hindu majority" is a constructed myth that obscures the true social composition of India. For Dwivedi, the "real majority" comprises the lower-caste communities—historically marginalized and oppressed under the caste system—who form the numerical and social backbone of the nation. Her critique, developed in collaboration with philosopher Shaj Mohan, offers a radical rethinking of Indian society, exposing the mechanisms of power t...
Post a Comment
Read more

THE DRAVIDIAN PEOPLE OF SOUTH ASIA

Dravidians are the most ancient ethno-linguistic group of South Asia. The migrations of the Indo-Aryans pushed them deeper into the subcontinent. But a few isolated groups still remain to tell the tale. They may not have the Ancestral South Indian (ASI) of most of the Dravidian people, but the Brahui language still spoken in Balochistan in the areas around Quetta, is tell tale evidence of our history.  The Brahui is an ethnic group residing in Balochistan and Sindh, in Pakistan. Their distant linguistic cousins reside in the states of Karnataka and Kerala, Tamil Nadu and Telangana in India.  The Brahui are an excellent example of this phenomenon. A Dravidian ethnic group residing in the deserts of Sindh and Balochistan in Pakistan, they share DNA with their Sindhi, Balochi and provincial neighbours of different ethnicities. But their nearest cousins are located in the states of Karnataka in India. Causal relationships between ethnic groups in the Indian Subcontinen...
Post a Comment
Read more