Peoples Telangana

 బహుజన జాగృతి:- ఛత్రపతి శివాజీ నుండి మహాత్మ  ఫూలే వరకు, అంబేద్కర్ గారి నుండి మన వరకు...కొన్ని నిజాలు💥💥💥 ☝️ప్రియమైన మిత్రులారా.... ⚡ఛత్రపతి శివాజీ (1600)కాలంలో ఇప్పుడు పిలుచుకునే Sc, Bc Oc లు లేరు, అప్పుడు ఉన్నది వర్ణ వ్యవస్థ అంటే అగ్ర వర్ణాలు (బ్రాహ్మణ, క్షత్రియ, వైశ్య), శూద్రులు (ఇప్పటి BC, రెడ్డి, కమ్మ, కాపు, వెలమలు etc), అంటరానివారు (మహర్, మాల, మాదిగ etc) మాత్రమే ఉన్నారు.... 💥ఆ కాలంలో దేశం ఒక్కటిగా లేదు బ్రిటిష్ వారి ఆదీనంలో ఉన్న ప్రాంతం కాకుండా సుమారు 600 పై చిలుకు రాజ్యాలుగా ఉండేవి. ఎవరి రాజ్యం వారిదే ...ఆ కాలంలో యుద్ధాలు మత ప్రాతిపదికన జరగలేదు ప్రాంతం మీద పట్టు, రాజ్యాధికారం కోసం మాత్రమే యుద్ధాలు జరిగేవి, శివాజీ ప్రధానంగా పోరాడింది బీజాపూర్ సుల్తానేట్, మొఘల్ సామ్రాజ్యం, కుతుబ్ షాహీ, పోర్చుగీస్ ఇండియా తో. .... శివాజీకి వ్యతిరేకంగా పోరాడిన వారిలో హిందూ రాజులు (జై సింగ్, జస్వంత్ సింగ్, బాజీ ఘోర్పడే, చంద్రరావు మోరే) చాలా మంది ఉన్నారు , అలాగే శివాజీ తరపున పోరాడిన ముస్లిం నాయకులు శివాజీ సైనికాధికారిగా, అంగ రక్షకుడిగా సిద్ధి ఇబ్రహీం, శివాజీ నౌక దళపతి దౌలత్ ఖాన్ ఇలా సైన్యంలో...

By  Nagesh Bhushan July 19, 2026 In the contemporary Indian political landscape, rhetoric often masks reality. A poignant critique recently raised by Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) leader Sanjay Singh cuts right to the heart of the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party’s (BJP) primary narrative. The BJP has long propelled itself on the claim that "Hindus are in danger" ( Hindu Khatre Mein Hain ). However, Singh sharply dismantled this premise with an undeniable demographic reality: "The Prime Minister of this country is a Hindu, the Home Minister is a Hindu, the Defense Minister is a Hindu. The Chief Ministers of 23 states are Hindus. When the entire machinery of governance is controlled by the majority community, how can Hindus possibly be in danger?" Singh’s ultimate challenge to the ruling dispensation was simple yet brutal: If Hindus are truly unsafe under an all-Hindu administration, it is an admission of profound incompetence. The ruling elite should apologize to the n...

Even in recent times, injustices continue to be committed against rationalists. If we think about why terrorism is thriving worldwide today, the answer we arrive at is, isn't it, religious fanaticism? Religious extremists are running amok in their attempt to establish religious empires. They are spewing hatred toward other religions — and no religion is exempt from spewing such hatred. We can see, right before our eyes, people who survive by exploiting religion, caste, and regional identity for politics. It only remains for us to recognize them. Much more could be said on this subject. But the immediate duty before us is this: to recognize and honor those noble individuals who lived without religion, to take them as role models, and to move forward, each within our own sphere. As for those who speak of divinity — they should, please, step outside without enjoying the fruits of human achievement, and prove for themselves what they truly are. In the ninth century, the Jain philosoph...

Many great figures — Einstein, Stephen Hawking, Richard Dawkins, Abraham T. Kovoor, Periyar E.V. Ramasamy — have said that "religious belief turns a person into a fool." This country's Prime Minister, along with several Union ministers, has proven that statement true. There is no harm or danger that comes from not following any religion or not praying to any god. There are countless examples of this. Christians, Muslims, Buddhists, and Jains, who do not follow Hinduism, face no danger from Hindu gods. Similarly, Hindus, Muslims, and people of other faiths who do not believe in Christianity face no danger or loss from the Christian God. Nor do people of other faiths who do not believe in Allah have anything to fear from him. All of this pertains purely to belief. That is why there are no real dangers that arise from a lack of religious belief — and no real benefits that arise from having it. Beliefs without proof, and illusions, hold no real value. When someone points o...

Dr. Devaraju Maharaju We have received a great deal of information about Jainism and Buddhism. But why has information about the Charvakas and their literature not survived? The answer is that Vedic religious propagandists deliberately destroyed that literature, leaving no trace of it! So how did even this much information reach us? It reached us through the writings of Vedic scholars who fiercely condemned the Charvaka/Lokayata school. In other words, some facts have come down to us from the opponents of the Charvakas. Whatever points these opponents disagreed with — in the course of writing about those disagreements — some of the Charvakas' ideas became known to us. Viewed through a rationalist lens, it appears that the Charvakas were speaking the truth. For example, Dayananda Saraswati, in his Satyartha Prakash , while describing how the Charvakas rejected the Vedas, wrote: "If Vedic knowledge is absent, ignorance will spread." Shall we accept that? Similarly, the Ch...