Peoples Telangana

An analytical overview of the current debate The immediate trigger: a Vande Mataram bill On July 30, 2025, Parliament passed a bill restoring all six original stanzas of "Vande Mataram" — Bankim Chandra Chattopadhyay's 1875 composition — for official use, amending the Prevention of Insults to National Honour Act, 1971, which otherwise governs flag and anthem protocol. In November, marking the song's 150th anniversary, Prime Minister Narendra Modi told Parliament that Jawaharlal Nehru had dropped four of the six stanzas in 1937 to appease the Muslim League and Mohammad Ali Jinnah. Critics dispute this account. The historical record shows the 1937 decision was made by the Congress Working Committee — which included Gandhi, Nehru, Sardar Patel, Subhas Chandra Bose, and J.B. Kripalani, among others — after consulting Rabindranath Tagore, who had first set the song to music. Tagore is widely reported to have recommended that only the first two stanzas be sung nationall...

UPSC Interview Game Explained - Civil Services Examination 2020 Marks -•  ★Name - Apala Mishra AIR - 9 Mains: 816 marks Interview: 215 marks Total Marks: 1031 marks   ★ Name - Ria Dabi AIR - 15 Mains: 859 marks Interview: 162 marks Grand Total: 1021 marks   There was a difference of 43 marks between the two in the written examination, but Apala Mishra was given 53 more marks in the interview, which made her a topper.  If Ria Dabi had received marks equal to Apala Mishra in the interview, then Ria Dabi would have been AIR 1 UPSCలో ఇంటర్వ్యూ ఆటను అర్థం చేసుకోండి -సివిల్ సర్వీసెస్ పరీక్ష 2020 మార్కులు -• ★ పేరు - అపాలా మిశ్రా AIR - 9 మెయిన్స్ : 816 మార్కులు ఇంటర్వ్యూ : 215 మార్కులు మొత్తం మార్కులు : 1031 మార్కులు  ★ పేరు - రియా డాబి AIR - 15 మెయిన్స్ : 859 మార్కులు ఇంటర్వ్యూ : 162 మార్కులు గ్రాండ్ టోటల్ : 1021 మార్కులు   వ్రాతపరీక్షలో ఇద్దరి మధ్య 43 మార్కుల తేడా ఉంది, కానీ అపాలా మిశ్రాకు ఇంటర్వ్యూలో 53 మార్కులు ఎక్కువ ఇచ్చి ఆమెను టాపర్‌గా చేశారు...

Source : https://www.facebook.com/share/1BeeVHKsKf/ By Devdutt Pattanaik Once there were four varnas. Now there are three. The Baniya who owns the temple, the Brahmin who guards it wearing a collar he mistakes for a crown, and the Shudra - the servant, the slave, the cockroach, the anti-national.  Look at sport. Every Commonwealth medal, every Olympic medal India has ever won, comes from Punjab, Haryana, from the wrestling akharas and the hockey fields of the north. Yet the games go to Gujarat. The stadiums rise in Gujarat. The budget, three times what Punjab and Haryana get combined, flows to a state that has never produced a medallist. Nobody asks why. The bureaucrat who could ask is a Brahmin. He does not ask. He signs. Look at the newsroom. Who reports the news. Brahmins, mostly. Who owns the channel. A vegetarian businessman. The canteen serves no meat, no onion, no garlic, and the reporter feels pure, feels pious, feels chosen. He does not notice his salary is a fraction of t...

The Paradigm Shift from 'Merit' to 'Representation' In contemporary high-stakes legal and policy discourse, reservation is frequently and erroneously reduced to a subsidiary welfare program or a poverty alleviation scheme. For the constitutional advocate, the strategic priority is to correct this misclassification. Reservation is a  sui generis  constitutional mechanism designed for substantive representation, anchored in Article 16(4) of the Constitution. Advocates must aggressively shift the debate from the atomized "numerical merit" of individual test scores to the structural necessity of "institutional representation." Systemic inequality cannot be remedied through an obsession with percentile points; it requires the democratization of institutional power to reflect the demographic reality of the Republic. Core Directive Statement   Objective:  The primary mandate for advocacy is the formalization of the distinction between  numerical merit ...

 By Chuppala Nagesh Bhushan A structured set of counter-narratives against the "Reservation Hatao" (remove-reservation) movement — organized by the type of argument it typically makes, with a rebuttal built for each. 1. Counter "Reservation = Merit Loss" argument Their claim: Reservation lets "unqualified" people in, lowering standards. Counter: Merit isn't caste-neutral to begin with — it's built on generations of unequal access to schools, nutrition, networks, and capital. Comparing outcomes without comparing starting lines isn't "merit," it's privilege wearing a lab coat. Point to data: reservation beneficiaries in IITs, IAS, and elsewhere routinely go on to match or outperform peers once given equal opportunity — the "merit gap" often closes fast once the resource gap does. Ask back: was it "merit" when entire castes were denied education, temple e...

MOHAN GURUSWAMY: The divide between the Keynesians and the Chicago school is as intense and often antagonistic as the Sunni-Shia, Catholic-Protestant or Thelakarai-Vadakarai Iyengar divides.  Now the only dispute on national income is how much will be the contraction. The Finance Ministry hopes there won’t be any. The IMF has officially said it will be 4.5%. The rating agencies predict a contraction of 6.8%, while many more are suggesting something closer to 10%. How do we deal with is now? The government of India has tended to be “conservative” in its outlook and has made no serious suggestion on economic stimulus. What it calls a stimulus is actually not a stimulus. The problem is more philosophical. Keynesian economics is a theory that says the government should increase demand to boost growth. Keynesians believe consumer demand is the primary driving force in an economy. As a result, the theory supports expansionary fiscal policy. The Chicago School is a neoclassical economic s...