Skip to main content

"One Nation, One Election" proposal raises concerns regarding India's federal structure:

Critics of the "One Nation, One Election" proposal raise several concerns:
  1. Threat to Democracy: It undermines democratic accountability, potentially favoring national parties over regional ones and leading to centralization of power, which could erode federalism
    .
  2. Constitutional Issues:  The bill is unconstitutional, it disrupts the parliamentary system and may require significant amendments to the Constitution, which could further dilute democratic processes

  3. Logistical Challenges: Implementing simultaneous elections poses logistical difficulties, such as mobilizing election staff and maintaining adequate voting infrastructure, raising questions about feasibility and cost-effectiveness
    .
  4. Public Consultation Flaws: The consultation process has been criticized for being limited in language accessibility, potentially excluding diverse regional voices from the discussion
    .
The "One Nation, One Election" proposal raises significant concerns regarding India's federal structure:
  1. Centralization of Power: Critics argue that simultaneous elections could undermine state autonomy, reinforcing central authority and diminishing the distinct political identities of states, which are crucial in a diverse nation like India
    .
  2. Impact on State Governance: The proposal may weaken the connection between voters and their state governments, as national issues could overshadow local concerns during elections, potentially leading to a disconnect in governance
    .
  3. Legal and Constitutional Challenges: Implementing this proposal requires extensive constitutional amendments, which could further entrench central dominance over states and complicate the federal balance established by the Constitution
    .
  4. Diversity of Political Cultures: The initiative risks flattening India's rich political diversity, as it may prioritize national narratives over regional issues, challenging the essence of federalism designed to accommodate varied local interests

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Unveiling the "Real Majority" of India

Unveiling the "Real Majority": Divya Dwivedi’s Critique of the Hindu Majority Narrative * In contemporary Indian discourse, the notion of a "Hindu majority" is often taken as an unassailable fact, with official statistics frequently citing approximately 80% of India’s population as Hindu. This framing shapes political campaigns, cultural narratives, and even national identity. However, philosopher and professor at IIT Delhi, Divya Dwivedi, challenges this narrative in her provocative and incisive work, arguing that the "Hindu majority" is a constructed myth that obscures the true social composition of India. For Dwivedi, the "real majority" comprises the lower-caste communities—historically marginalized and oppressed under the caste system—who form the numerical and social backbone of the nation. Her critique, developed in collaboration with philosopher Shaj Mohan, offers a radical rethinking of Indian society, exposing the mechanisms of power t...

Mallanna Unleashes TRP: A New Dawn for Marginalized Voices in Telangana's Power Game

On September 17, 2025, Chintapandu Naveen Kumar, popularly known as Teenmar Mallanna—a prominent Telugu journalist, YouTuber, and former Congress MLC—launched the Telangana Rajyadhikara Party (TRP) in Hyderabad at the Taj Krishna Hotel. The event, attended by Backward Classes (BC) intellectuals, former bureaucrats, and community leaders, marked a significant moment for marginalized groups in Telangana. Mallanna, suspended from Congress in March 2025 for anti-party activities (including criticizing and burning the state's caste survey report), positioned TRP as a dedicated platform for BCs, Scheduled Castes (SCs), Scheduled Tribes (STs), minorities, and the economically weaker sections. The party's vision emphasizes "Samajika Telangana" (a socially just Telangana) free from fear, hunger, corruption, and prejudice, with a focus on inclusive development and responsible governance. Key highlights from the launch: Symbolism : The date coincided with Periyar Jayanti and V...

Casteist Indian Bankers: Caste Bias Still Haunts Indian Banking

The Problem: Caste discrimination continues to plague the Indian banking sector, limiting access to credit for millions of lower-caste citizens. Data Point: A study  found that Scheduled Tribes (STs) face a 5-7% lower loan approval rate compared to higher castes, even after controlling for socioeconomic factors. How it Works: Discrimination in Action: Lower-caste individuals often encounter: Higher rejection rates for loan applications. Smaller loan amounts compared to higher-caste applicants. Less favorable terms, such as higher interest rates and stricter collateral requirements. The "Depositors, Not Borrowers" Mindset: Banks often view lower-caste individuals primarily as depositors, not as creditworthy borrowers. The Impact: Limited Economic Mobility: Restricted access to credit hampers entrepreneurship, reduces income growth, and perpetuates poverty cycles within marginalized communities. Reliance on Informal Lenders: The lack of access to formal ba...