As Donald Trump embarks on his second term as U.S. president, India faces a conundrum. The euphoria among some Indian nationalists, who once saw Trump as a kindred spirit in his anti-China stance and strongman persona, has given way to disillusionment. His recent pronouncements—pressuring Apple’s Tim Cook and Tesla’s Elon Musk to shun manufacturing in India, boasting of strong-arming New Delhi into ceasefires, and cozying up to controversial Middle Eastern regimes—reveal a leader driven by self-promotion and American economic nationalism. With Trump’s “America First” agenda set to dominate until 2029, India must chart a pragmatic course to safeguard its economic ambitions, security interests, and global standing.
The Economic Tightrope
Trump’s trade policies pose an immediate threat. His proposed tariffs—potentially 10-20% on all imports—could hit India’s $120 billion export market to the U.S., its largest, hard. Sectors like pharmaceuticals, IT services, and textiles, which employ millions, are vulnerable. Worse, Trump’s reported directives to U.S. firms to prioritize domestic production undermine India’s bid to become a global manufacturing hub. Apple’s iPhone assembly and Google’s Pixel production in India, spurred by the government’s Production-Linked Incentive scheme, face uncertainty if American companies bow to White House pressure.
Yet India is not without leverage. Its fast-growing economy, projected to hit $4 trillion by 2027, makes it an attractive market for U.S. goods, from energy to agriculture. New Delhi should offer targeted tariff reductions on American products to fend off broader trade penalties while accelerating free-trade talks with the European Union, Britain, and ASEAN to diversify its $650 billion export base. Domestically, doubling down on “Make in India” can lure non-American firms—Samsung, TSMC, or Volkswagen—eager to hedge against China’s slowdown and Trump’s trade wars.
Security: A Delicate Balance
On security, Trump’s hostility toward China aligns with India’s concerns, particularly after the 2020 Galwan clash along their disputed border. The Quad—comprising India, the U.S., Japan, and Australia—offers a platform to deepen maritime security and technology-sharing, reinforcing India’s role as an Indo-Pacific counterweight. Targeted defense deals, like co-producing drones or cybersecurity systems, can cement ties without compromising India’s indigenous programs, such as the Tejas fighter jet or BrahMos missile.
But Trump’s erratic diplomacy complicates matters. His engagement with Gulf states like Qatar, a key supplier of India’s LNG but criticized for its ties to extremist groups, and his exaggerated claims of brokering Syrian ceasefires, raise questions about his reliability. India must also tread carefully with Russia, its largest arms supplier and a growing source of discounted oil. Transparent communication with Washington can mitigate risks of sanctions under America’s CAATSA law, framing India as a stabilizing force in a multipolar world.
Diplomacy in the Age of Braggadocio
Trump’s penchant for self-aggrandizement—claiming credit for India’s bilateral agreements with Pakistan or China—grates on New Delhi’s fiercely independent foreign policy. India must counter such narratives swiftly, using diplomatic channels and media to reaffirm its autonomy. High-profile summits, like the 2019 “Howdy Modi” event, can stroke Trump’s ego while securing goodwill, but New Delhi must firmly reject any mediation on Kashmir or other disputes.
Engaging Trump’s inner circle—trade advisors, national security officials, and Congress—is equally vital. The 4.5 million-strong Indian-American diaspora, influential in tech and politics, can amplify India’s case. Globally, India should seize Trump’s retreat from multilateralism to lead in forums like the G20 or BRICS, positioning itself as a voice for the Global South.
Technology and Energy: Building Resilience
Trump’s restrictions on H-1B visas and technology exports threaten India’s $150 billion IT sector and access to critical inputs like semiconductors. Investing in domestic R&D—through initiatives like the National Mission on Quantum Technologies—and partnering with Japan or Israel for tech transfers can reduce dependence. India’s emergence as a manufacturing hub for Google and Apple products positions it to attract further investment, especially as firms diversify from China.
Energy security is another priority. India’s reliance on Qatar and Saudi Arabia for 40% of its energy imports requires stable Gulf ties, even as Trump’s Middle East deals raise eyebrows. Long-term LNG contracts and new suppliers like Australia can insulate India from disruptions. Meanwhile, the 8 million Indian expatriates in the Gulf offer economic and diplomatic leverage to counterbalance Qatar’s influence.
The Long Game
India’s strategic autonomy, rooted in its non-aligned tradition, equips it to navigate Trump’s volatility. Its $80 billion defense budget, nuclear arsenal, and world-class space program—evidenced by the Chandrayaan-3 moon landing—provide a foundation of strength. Yet vulnerabilities remain: import dependence for oil and semiconductors, and a per capita income of just $2,500, limit its room for error.
The disappointment among India’s right-wing, who misread Trump as a steadfast ally, underscores a broader lesson: no U.S. president will prioritize India over domestic interests. New Delhi must blend pragmatism with assertiveness—engaging Trump on shared goals like countering China, diversifying partnerships to weather trade shocks, and projecting confidence through achievements like ISRO’s upcoming Gaganyaan mission. Tough times may loom, but India’s rising clout and diplomatic agility can turn Trump’s tenure into an opportunity to solidify its place on the global stage.
Comments
Post a Comment