Three Years On, Kamareddy Promises Remain Unfulfilled – Backward Classes Betrayed
T. Chiranjeevulu IAS(Ret), Founder President BCIF(BC Intellectuals Forum)
(What happened to the
21 promises made to the BCs? Is this the Congress brand of keeping promises?)
On 10 November 2023, the Congress party announced 21 major promises
to the Backward Classes (BCs) at Kamareddy. Today, three years have been
completed. It made numerous pledges on the upliftment of BCs, economic
empowerment, educational development, employment opportunities and political
representation. Trusting those promises, the BC community lent its political
support to bring the Congress party to power.
Ahead of the Telangana Assembly elections, the BC Declaration
announced by the Congress party at Kamareddy was released by Karnataka Chief
Minister Siddaramaiah. Let us take a look at how it has been implemented.
I. Grand Promises – Zero Action
Of the 21 promises, only the formation of the Munnuru Kapu
Corporation and the caste census have been implemented, and that only
partially. The remaining 19 promises have not been implemented at all. Not a
single promise has been fully kept. What greater discrimination against the BCs
can there be than this?
|
No. |
Kamareddy Declaration Promise |
Current Status of Implementation |
|
1 |
Caste census and increase in BC reservations within
six months |
Caste census conducted at the demand of BC
associations; reservations not increased – partial implementation |
|
2 |
42%
reservations in local bodies; sub-categorisation |
42% not delivered. The government
passed a bill in the Assembly and washed its hands of it; there is no sincere
fight against the Centre. An invalid GO was issued to mislead the BCs, and
the court blocked it – not implemented |
|
3 |
42% reservation in government civil contracts |
Not implemented – a GO that would cost
not a paisa, yet there is no will even to issue one |
|
4 |
Statutory
backing for the Phule BC Sub-Plan |
Not implemented |
|
5 |
₹20,000 crore every year; ₹1 lakh crore in five
years |
Not implemented |
|
6 |
Separate
Ministry for MBCs (Most Backward Classes) |
Not implemented |
|
7 |
Corporations for all BC castes; ₹10 lakh loans |
Corporations formed for 5 new castes,
but loan facility is zero – not implemented |
|
8 |
BC Unity
Bhavans at ₹50 crore each in district centres |
Not implemented |
|
9 |
A BC Gurukul in every mandal; a degree college in
every district |
Not implemented |
|
10 |
Full fee
reimbursement for eligible BC students |
Not implemented |
|
11 |
Occupational bazaars with 50 shops in every mandal |
Not implemented |
|
12 |
Pension age for
traditional-occupation workers lowered to 50 years |
Not implemented |
|
13 |
Elections for BC associations; ₹10 lakh for each
association |
Not implemented |
|
14 |
Inclusion of
Mudiraj, Mutrasi and Tenugollu in BC-A |
Not implemented |
|
15 |
Telangana Fisheries Development Board |
Not implemented |
|
16 |
Second phase of
sheep distribution to Yadavas and Kurumas within 100 days of coming to power |
Not implemented |
|
17 |
Palm groves, subsidies and liquor-shop reservations
for Goud communities |
Not implemented |
|
18 |
Munnuru Kapu
Corporation; subsidised loans for young entrepreneurs |
Partial implementation |
|
19 |
Mega powerloom clusters for Padmashalis |
Not implemented |
|
20 |
Toolkits with
90% subsidy for Vishwakarmas |
Not implemented |
|
21 |
Laundromats for Rajakas; modernisation of dhobi
ghats |
Not implemented |
II. The Core Promise of the BC Declaration – The
Financial Pledge
₹20,000 crore for BCs
every year, ₹1 lakh crore over five years – this has proved to be an empty
promise.
Why has a government that spends 90 percent of the State budget been
unable to spend even 25 percent of the funds allocated to BCs? Is this how
little BCs matter to it?
After the Congress government came to power, a look at the budget
allocations and actual expenditure of the last three financial years shows a
huge gap between the promise made in the Declaration and the government’s
performance.
1. Three
Years of BC Budget Allocations
At the promised ₹20,000 crore a year, ₹60,000 crore should have been
allocated over three years. Allocations have been limited to ₹33,116 crore.
|
Financial Year |
Allocation for BCs |
|
2024–25 |
₹9,200
crore |
|
2025–26 |
₹11,405 crore |
|
2026–27 |
₹12,511
crore |
|
Total |
₹33,116 crore |
In other words, over three years the government has allocated
₹26,884 crore less than the promised amount. Expenditure over the last two
years has been only ₹5,140 crore.
2.
Allocations Are One Thing, Actual Spending Another!
Announcing allocations in the budget is not development in itself.
The funds must be released and must actually benefit BCs through schemes.
According to the expenditure figures provided:
|
Financial Year |
Allocation |
Actual Expenditure |
|
2024–25 |
₹9,200
crore |
₹2,285.93
crore |
|
2025–26 |
₹11,405 crore |
₹2,857.32 crore |
|
Total |
₹20,605 crore |
₹5,143.25 crore |
·
Of the ₹20,605 crore allocated
in these two years, only ₹5,143.25 crore was spent.
·
That is only about 24.96
percent.
·
The remaining ₹15,461.75 crore
was not spent.
The 2026–27 financial year is still under
way, so its final expenditure figures are yet to come. Spending this year too
is likely to be about the same.
Another important point: this BC budget also includes allocations
relating to EBCs (Economically Backward Classes), accounting for 10 percent of
it. (Source: Budget books)
3.
Compared with the State Budget, the Neglect of BCs Is Even Clearer
This is where the real question arises.
|
Financial Year |
State Budget |
State Expenditure |
|
2024–25 |
₹2.91
lakh crore |
₹2.66
lakh crore |
|
2025–26 |
₹3.04 lakh crore |
₹2.81 lakh crore |
|
Total |
₹5.95 lakh crore |
₹5.47 lakh crore |
The State government has spent about 91.93 percent of its total
budget.
Why, then, did the same government spend only 24.96 percent of the
budget allocated to BCs? A government able to spend funds on other departments
— why could it not fully utilise the funds earmarked for BC welfare? The
government must answer these questions.
4. What
Has Happened to the Development of the Backward Castes?
The most backward castes among the BCs — the MBCs, nomadic tribes,
denotified tribes and small occupation-based castes — face severe economic and
social backwardness.
They need a special action plan, special financial assistance and
employment opportunities for their development.
Although caste-wise corporations have been set up, the details of
the funds allocated to them in the budget, and their release and expenditure,
are given in the table below.
F.Y.
2025–26 (amounts in ₹ crore)
|
Sl. No. |
Corporation |
Allocation |
Released |
Spent |
|
1 |
BC Finance Corporation |
657.00 |
289.07 |
0 |
|
2 |
MBC Corporation |
400 |
100 |
0 |
|
3 |
Rajaka Corporation |
50 |
12.50 |
0 |
|
4 |
Nayi Brahmin
Corporation |
50 |
12.50 |
0 |
|
5 |
Toddy Tappers (Geeta Karmika) Corporation |
68 |
34 |
17 |
|
6 |
Vaddera
Corporation |
50 |
12.50 |
0 |
|
7 |
Sagara (Uppara) Corporation |
50 |
12.50 |
0 |
|
8 |
Valmiki–Boya
Corporation |
50 |
12.50 |
0 |
|
9 |
Krishna Balija–Pusala Corporation |
50 |
12.50 |
0 |
|
10 |
Batraja
Corporation |
50 |
12.50 |
0 |
|
11 |
Kummari Corporation |
50 |
12.50 |
0 |
|
12 |
Medari
Corporation |
50 |
12.50 |
0 |
|
13 |
Vishwabrahmin Corporation |
50 |
12.50 |
0 |
|
14 |
Mudiraj
Corporation |
50 |
12.50 |
0 |
|
15 |
Yadava Corporation |
50 |
12.50 |
0 |
|
16 |
Kurma
Corporation |
50 |
12.50 |
0 |
|
17 |
Munnuru Kapu Corporation |
50 |
12.50 |
0 |
|
18 |
Padmashali
Corporation |
50 |
12.50 |
0 |
|
19 |
Perika Corporation |
50 |
12.50 |
0 |
|
20 |
Lingayat
Corporation |
50 |
12.50 |
0 |
|
21 |
Mera Corporation |
50 |
12.50 |
0 |
|
22 |
Gangaputra
Corporation |
50 |
12.50 |
0 |
|
23 |
EBC Corporation |
50 |
12.50 |
0 |
|
|
Total |
2125.00 |
707.07 |
17.00 |
Other Financial Allocations
|
Scheme |
Allocation (₹ crore) |
Released (₹ crore) |
Spent (₹ crore) |
|
Rajiv Yuva Vikasam |
1,800 |
0 |
0 |
The previous year too, these same allocations were made to the BC
corporations/federations, with zero spending. The previous B.R.S. government
showed the same neglect, and paid a fitting price for it. In the 12 years since
Telangana was formed, rulers from the dominant castes have been suppressing BCs
in every sphere.
5. The
BC Community Must Hold the Government to Account!
Should BCs not progress economically? Must they live only on
government subsidies? Is this the attitude of dominant-caste governments? In a
State where BCs are more than 56 percent of the population, how can BC
development be possible if adequate funds are not spent on their economic
advancement?
Irrigation projects worth lakhs of crores, Musi development, Metro
Rail, Future City, construction of Young India school buildings — are you short
of money only when it comes to giving to BCs? So the BC community asks. The
Kamareddy BC Declaration must not remain merely a document of promises made at
election time. This pledge was a promise of political, economic and social
justice to the BC community.
III. 42% Reservations in Local Bodies, Education
and Jobs – A Deceitful Stance
State government
negligence, Union government indifference!
The Congress government promised in the Kamareddy BC Declaration to
implement 42 percent reservations, yet even three years after taking office it
has failed to fulfil that promise. Citing legal problems posed by the 50
percent reservation ceiling, and at the demand of BC associations, the State
government sent the relevant bills to the Centre for inclusion in the Ninth
Schedule and then washed its hands of the matter. There is no evidence that it
pressed the Centre for their approval.
Is a one-day dharna at Jantar Mantar in Delhi enough? Has the Chief
Minister met the Prime Minister and discussed this issue? Has he not taken an
all-party delegation to Delhi? Rahul Gandhi, who at every turn declares that he
will break the 50% ceiling — has he raised this matter in Parliament? Why is
the Congress leadership, which announced that it would break the 50 percent
reservation limit, showing no initiative in implementing the promise made to
Telangana’s BCs? Is this not a deceitful stance? Did they not know, when they
made the promise, that there would be legal problems?
Caught between State government negligence and Union government
indifference, the future of BC unemployed youth is in question. That is why
incidents of BC youth suicides are recurring of late.
IV. Grave Injustice in Politics and Nominated
Posts Too
Over the last three years of Congress rule, BCs have suffered
serious neglect politically. They have been given only nominal representation
in nominated posts and corporation chairmanships.
The number of BCs in the Assembly is already very low. This
government has not even had the sense to give nominated MLC seats to the most
backward communities. The legislatures are entirely dominated by the dominant
castes. Recently, both MLC posts were again allotted to the dominant castes,
and even in the Cabinet BCs have been limited to just two. The government is
not even paying attention to the strong BC movement under way in Telangana.
This amounts to wounding the self-respect of the BCs. BCs must be given a share
not only in development and welfare but also in power, in proportion to their
population.
V. Time for the Congress Government to
Introspect
A government that came to power with the votes of BCs and has failed
to implement the promises made to them has committed a grave error. If promises
are made for political convenience and forgotten once in power, the BC
community will not stay silent.
That BCs still have to take to the streets for their rights after
three years of rule is not their failure; it is a situation created by the
government itself. In a democracy, BCs are not mere voters; they are rightful
claimants to a fair share of power. Governments must recognise this reality. If
they ignore the promises made, they will have to face the people’s wrath. We
urge you to remember where the people seated the B.R.S. government, which
earlier worked against the BCs.
Comments
Post a Comment