It's Not Just a Bill
During the special Parliament sessions on the 16th, 17th, and 18th of this month, a special discussion on the Women's Reservation Bill is reportedly scheduled. Through the 106th Constitutional Amendment, known as the Nari Shakti Vandan Adhiniyam, 2023, a decision has already been taken to provide 1/3 reservation for women in legislative bodies. While this is an important step toward women's empowerment, serious doubts are being raised about its implementation.
When this amendment was passed, a key condition was included — the reservations would come into effect only after the 2027 Census and the subsequent delimitation of constituencies. The original intent was implementation from the 2029 general Lok Sabha elections. However, the central government is now reportedly moving to fast-track this process and implement it immediately through appropriate constitutional amendments, even without the census and delimitation.
This development raises a fundamental question: Is this an acceleration of women's empowerment — or an acceleration of structural inequality?
Horizontal Reservation — But an Unequal Foundation
Women's reservation is horizontal in nature — meaning 1/3 of the seats within already existing categories (SC, ST, General) are allocated to women. But there is a clear gap in India's political system: while SC/STs have vertical reservations under Articles 340 and 342, OBCs have no vertical reservation in legislative bodies whatsoever. Therefore, OBC women receive no horizontal reservation either.
In this context, if women's reservation is implemented:
- SC/ST women will gain 1/3 representation within their own quotas
- Women from dominant castes in the General category will benefit the most
- With no quota for OBCs, OBC men risk becoming marginal or invisible
- OBC women will be left completely orphaned
The Telangana Assembly Example: What the Numbers Reveal
If we consider the possibility of Telangana's assembly seats increasing from the current 119 to around 179 or 180:
- SC seats: approximately 27
- ST seats: approximately 18
Women's reservation will apply within these:
- SC women → 9 seats
- ST women → 6 seats
- Total SC/ST seats → 45, of which women get 15
Remaining → 135 General seats
Of these:
- 1/3 for women → 45 seats
- Remaining → 90 seats (General)
Of these 90:
- Approximately 10–12 seats may go to Muslim minorities
- Remaining → approximately 80 seats, where OBCs must compete
Current figures show approximately 19 OBC members out of 119 (~16%), but under the new arrangement, OBC men would compete for only 80 seats (180 - 45 - 45 - 10), meaning their numbers won't grow at all:
- OBC men (at current representation) → 16 to 20 seats (135 × 16%)
- OBC women → 4–5 seats
- Total OBC representation → only 20–25 out of 180, i.e., just 12–14%
In the current Lok Sabha, among 17 members from Telangana: six are Reddys, one Velama, one minority, three SCs, two STs, and four BCs. If women's reservations are implemented, the number of MPs from Telangana may rise from 17 to 25–26, but OBCs will gain nothing. Currently, OBCs number 138 in the Lok Sabha (25.4%), but this percentage will certainly decline once the Women's Reservation Bill is implemented. The Telangana Assembly figures demonstrate this clearly.
Sub-categorization must also be done within OBCs, providing reservations for the most backward sections and their women. Only then will social justice truly reach everyone.
What Does History Tell Us?
Leaders who recognized this problem early — Kanshi Ram, Mulayam Singh Yadav, and Lalu Prasad Yadav — were not against women's reservation. But they warned clearly: "If women's reservation is implemented without an OBC quota, it will only benefit the upper castes." And now that very truth is about to become reality.
The bill was placed before Parliament on several occasions but could not be passed. Now the BJP government is passing it using its majority.
Speed Is Not the Goal — Justice Is
From "Nastri Swatantram Arhate" (the Manusmriti dictum that women do not deserve freedom) to the Indian Constitution providing 1/3 reservation for women — this is a great historic and social justice process. A progressive and forward-looking step. Women in this country face two forms of discrimination: gender discrimination and caste discrimination. That is why women's reservation is necessary.
They are about to rewrite the history of Indian democracy. But it is deeply regrettable that the 25% of the population that is OBC women have no reservation in this process.
Any reservation must benefit all sections of society equally and must not do injustice to any one group. If implemented purely for political gains — without data, without addressing caste inequalities, without listening to OBC grievances — this is not women's empowerment. It is legalizing representational inequality.
Why the Rush to Fast-Track?
Had the original plan been followed — census first, then delimitation — there would at least have been an opportunity to review representation and potentially provide reservations for OBCs in legislative bodies. But implementing it now without data, without correcting structural inequalities, is not a swift decision — it is a systemic mistake.
BC organizations believe that the BJP is deliberately using women's reservation to undermine OBC reservations. There is also suspicion that the central government is moving preemptively, knowing that a caste census would trigger a nationwide intensification of the BC reservation movement.
The BJP government has already introduced the 10% EWS reservation for upper castes without being asked, dealing a blow to BCs. Similarly, these reservations will benefit upper-caste women while OBCs suffer heavily — that much is clear.
Even existing BC leadership will inevitably face difficulties due to these women's reservations. The Centre set aside the 42% reservation bill passed by the Telangana Assembly, while going ahead with everything it wants — revoking Article 370, demonetization, introducing EWS reservations — yet it finds no will to include the OBC 42% reservation bill in the 9th Schedule. This is plainly an injustice to BCs.
They claim they will conduct a caste census, but in the first phase, OBC households are not being counted. Whether OBCs will even be counted in the second phase — and whether those numbers will be placed before the public — is the million-dollar question.
Our Demands
- First, provide vertical reservation for OBCs in legislative bodies. Just as constitutional amendments are made every 10 years for SC/ST reservations, a constitutional amendment must similarly guarantee at least 27% representation for BCs in legislatures.
- Within that, implement 1/3 women's reservation as an OBC women's sub-quota.
- Determine OBC representation on the basis of a caste census.
- The 42% reservation bill sent by the Telangana government must be approved in this Parliament session and included in the 9th Schedule.
Without these measures, this law will not deliver complete justice.
"Without a share, there can be no equality. Without representation, democracy is incomplete."
It is increasingly clear through numerous actions that the central government will not do justice to OBCs. Congress and BRS are also complicit through their silence. Therefore, unless OBC organizations launch a large-scale nationwide movement and claim their rightful reservations as their due right, they will have been deceived once again.
Comments
Post a Comment