Telangana’s village revolt: Backward Classes redraw Telangana’s rural map

By Nagesh Bhushan Chuppala 

In Telangana’s gram panchayat elections, conducted in three phases throughout December 2025, candidates from the Backward Classes (BCs) have emerged as the unequivocal victors, claiming a disproportionate share of sarpanch positions despite meagre formal reservations. With some 12,700 villages voting in contests ostensibly devoid of party symbols, BC aspirants secured between 40% and 50% of posts overall—vastly surpassing the 17% quota constrained by protracted legal disputes—and seized more than half the open-category seats long monopolised by upper castes.

This remarkable advance, evident across districts from Adilabad to the southern plains, bespeaks a deepening political consciousness among BCs, who constitute more than half the state’s populace yet have historically been marginalised by the established political order. A sustained two-year agitation for 42% reservations, a comprehensive caste census and broader social equity seems to have borne fruit at the grassroots, emboldening BC contenders to challenge entrenched elites in general constituencies and prevail against the customary arsenal of pecuniary inducements and coercion.

The outcome also bolstered the incumbent Congress party, whose favoured candidates captured over half the sarpanch posts—perhaps 7,000 in all—reaffirming the enduring perks of power in rural India. The principal opposition, Bharat Rashtra Samithi, salvaged a creditable second place with roughly 28%, while the Bharatiya Janata Party languished in the low single digits, underscoring its waning appeal in the state. Voter participation was notably robust, averaging 84-86% across phases, a testament to the abiding vigour of local democracy. Independents, many animated by BC grievances, garnered about 12% of seats, hinting at a drift toward ideology over mere partisanship.

Yet the polls were not unblemished. The Congress administration’s inability to enact its vaunted 42% BC quota—thwarted by judicial intervention—invited acerbic reproaches from BC groupings, who decried the habitual exploitation of their votes without commensurate empowerment. Persistent accounts of cash, liquor and lavish feasts deployed to sway electors revived perennial anxieties about probity in India’s hinterland. Furthermore, the nominally non-partisan framework frequently concealed clandestine party patronage, clouding the transparency of the exercise.

For the dominant castes and the trio of mainstream parties, long habituated to treating BC support as a reliable reservoir, these verdicts from the villages constitute a stern admonition. Telangana’s rural polity appears to be embarking on a more combative, caste-aware phase, with clamours for equitable share, dignity and authority resonating ever more forcefully. Should this mobilisation endure, it may profoundly alter forthcoming mandal and zilla parishad contests and even presage upheaval in the 2028 assembly elections, compelling parties toward authentic inclusivity—or courting further attrition of their rustic foundations.