By T.Chiranjeevulu, IAS (Ret), Founder & Chairman of BCIF ( BC Intellectuals Forum)
On August 9, 2026, a meeting was organized in Nalgonda
district under the banner "Social Justice Struggle Yatra for BC
Rights." At this event, the political landscape of Nalgonda district was
unveiled.
This political landscape raises a serious question before
us: Why do BCs, who form the majority of the population, remain a minority in
political power?
Looking at the last 16 assembly elections in Nalgonda
district, out of a total of 194 seats, BCs won only 19 seats — 9.65%. But
according to the state's SEEEPEC (caste) survey, the BC population is 56%,
while their political representation is only 9.65%. Even more surprising is
that although there are 134 castes among BCs, only four castes have ever
crossed the threshold of the assembly. 130 castes have never set foot in the
assembly.
(While Reddys won 578 seats across the state in all 16
elections combined, 98 of those — 16.95% — came from Nalgonda district alone.)
Velamas won 13 seats, Brahmins 9, Kammas 5, Rajus 1, and
Vaishyas 1. Dominant castes together secured 127 seats (65.5%). A total of 13
women were elected (6.70%), of whom 12 were Reddy women, and one was a BC woman
— Kamalamma Yadav from Nakrekal.
Yadavas, who make up 11.82% of the population, got only 8
seats (4.1%); Goudas, at 9.55% of the population, got 7 seats (3.6%);
Padmashalis got 3 seats; and Kurmas got only 1 seat.
On the other hand, a few dominant castes that together make
up less than 10% of the district's population won about 65% of the assembly
seats over the last 16 elections. This is not merely an electoral statistic —
it is a mirror reflecting the enormous gap between population and power
representation in our democracy.
What is the situation at the state level?
In Telangana, according to the SEEEPEC survey, BCs make up
about 56.33% of the population. Out of a total of 1,741 seats contested in the
last 16 assembly elections, BCs won only 277. Meanwhile, the Reddy community,
which makes up only about 4.7% of the population, won 578 seats; Velamas, about
0.3% of the population, won 148 seats; Kammas won 73; and Brahmins won 127.
Dominant social groups with small populations received political representation
far in excess of their population share.
SCs and STs, because of constitutionally mandated
reservations, receive representation in specific seats. But the situation for
BCs is different — despite being a majority of the population, their share of
political power remains very small.
Here, before blaming others, we must ask ourselves some
questions. Why are BCs a minority in the assembly despite being a majority? Why
don't BCs get seats even though BC votes are numerous? When the voters are our
own people, why aren't the elected representatives our own people too?
This is a combination of many social, economic, political,
and psychological factors.
1. Population strength → vote strength is not translating
into power strength
Although BCs make up about 56% of the population, during
elections BC votes get split across many parties and many candidates. As a
result, a numerical majority in society does not become a political majority.
2. The BC vote has become a "party vote" rather
than a "caste vote"
Many BC voters give priority to the party symbol, the
personal influence of the leader, local relationships, welfare schemes, and
election promises, rather than to a candidate from their own caste. In other
words, the question "Which party is ours?" comes ahead of the
question "Who gets our votes?"
3. Internal division among BCs is a major problem
BC is not a single caste — it is a broad category made up of
many occupational and social castes. Each caste has its own local leadership,
interests, and political affiliations. Because of this division, it has become
difficult for 56% of the population to unite as a single political force. But
there is a need to unite around certain common issues.
4. Dominant castes have strong economic-social networks
Communities that historically have strong social networks in
land, business, education, financial resources, local institutions, and
political relationships find it easier to field candidates, campaign, and
mobilize resources during elections. So "organized strength" has a
greater impact on elections than sheer population numbers.
5. BCs have leadership, but collective political
leadership is lacking
Although there are talented leaders within the BC community,
the key weakness is that they have not been brought together around a single
social-political agenda. Individual leadership exists — but collective BC
leadership is weak.
6. The mindset of "vote for whoever will win"
rather than "our person must win"
This is a very important psychological factor. If a BC voter
feels that a candidate from their own community has little chance of winning,
they may vote for a stronger candidate out of the thought "my vote
shouldn't be wasted." This creates a cycle: fear of losing → strategic
voting → benefit to candidates from dominant groups.
7. The influence of money — Those who can spend
heavily in elections get more opportunities; media platforms that shape public
opinion are concentrated in a few hands; muscle power and political networks
matter; political parties tend to give tickets to "winning horses";
long-standing political relationships and institutional strength play a role;
there is inequality in ticket distribution, and BC candidates don't get a fair
number of tickets — these are also contributing causes.
8. Lack of political unity among BCs — voting split
along caste lines and party lines; gaps in leadership structure; failure to
continuously build strong alternative leadership from the village level to the
state level; lack of awareness about the value of one's vote; using votes for
short-term benefits during elections while ignoring long-term political
interests.
9. Voter consciousness — the first step toward BC
political liberation
One key reason for the political backwardness of BCs is
insufficient awareness of the value of their vote. A vote is not merely a right
— it is power; it is the democratic weapon that determines our future.
BCs must recognize the value of their vote and think
unitedly, setting aside differences of caste, region, and personal preference.
In every election, instead of asking "who is the candidate," we
should ask "what will this person do for social justice, BC rights, and
political representation?"
We must think freely, without being swayed by money, caste,
media influence, or temptations, and vote for our own future. "Our votes
are ours — the seats should be ours too" must become not just a slogan but
a political consciousness. BC organizations, intellectuals, and youth must
together launch a voter-awareness movement in every village.
Let us elect representatives through our votes — let us
secure our rights through our representatives — let us achieve social justice
through political representation.
The vote is ours — the decision is ours! Our votes are ours
— the seats should be ours too! The rights are ours — the power is ours too!
This is the consciousness that must emerge.
9. BCs must shed
mental servitude
Many castes within the BC community must move beyond the
limited thinking of "it's enough if we get our livelihood." We must
think about why our lives are not changing. One of the main reasons for our
backwardness is the lack of political power. The same hunger for political
power that dominant castes have must also arise among BCs. Political power does
not come as a favor from anyone — it must be earned through our numerical
strength, unity, consciousness, and struggle. Our greatest strength is our
numbers. If we can shape that numerical strength into political power, power
will come into our hands. When power is in our hands, we can make our own
decisions about our lives; we can shape the laws and policies we need; we can
protect our own rights ourselves. That is why BCs must first shed mental
servitude. "Our vote is our weapon — our vote is the foundation of our
power." From now on, it should not be a mindset that accepts the dominance
of others, but a political consciousness that lives with self-respect. The
numerical strength is ours — the consciousness is ours — the unity is ours —
the political power must be ours too!
10. Where reservations exist, the situation is different
Because SCs/STs have constitutionally reserved
constituencies, there is an institutional safeguard for their representation.
Since BCs do not have such constituency-based reservation in general assembly
seats, they have ended up without representation. That is why they need
reservations in the legislative bodies.
Gen Z — A New Force for Social Justice
The mobile phone in your hand has brought the world into
your palm. Within seconds, you can learn about anything happening anywhere in
the world. But are we learning about our own society?
Who were our ancestors? What were their occupations? Why are
we economically, educationally, and politically backward? Why has our history,
culture, and labor never received the recognition they deserve?
Gen Z must first ask, "What is our situation?"
Then ask, "Why did this happen?" And finally think, "How do we
change this?"
Our backwardness did not form in a single day. Problems like
generations of exclusion from education, unequal resources, lack of economic
opportunity, and lack of political representation have accumulated over time.
So learn the data, learn the history, read the Constitution.
Politically, one question must always be asked: "Who is
our vote making win? How much representation is our vote actually bringing
us?"
Population strength → vote strength → political
representation → this must become decision-making power.
Education is our first weapon. Education is not just for
jobs — it is for questioning, for knowing our rights, for recognizing
misinformation, and for deciding our own future.
Our ancestors' occupations were not small. Society was built
on their labor. So Gen Z must document the history of our villages, the history
of our occupations, and the struggles of our ancestors, and share them with the
world.
Social justice is not hatred toward anyone. It is equality
of opportunity, justice in representation, equality in dignity, and
participation in development.
Change is possible only through Gen Z youth. Seize
opportunities. Question injustice. Uphold constitutional values. Stand up for
social justice. Rise to become guides for society.

Comments
Post a Comment