Skip to main content

Three Varnas of Bharat

Source: https://www.facebook.com/share/1BeeVHKsKf/

By Devdutt Pattanaik

Once there were four varnas. Now there are three. The Baniya who owns the temple, the Brahmin who guards it wearing a collar he mistakes for a crown, and the Shudra - the servant, the slave, the cockroach, the anti-national. 

Look at sport. Every Commonwealth medal, every Olympic medal India has ever won, comes from Punjab, Haryana, from the wrestling akharas and the hockey fields of the north. Yet the games go to Gujarat. The stadiums rise in Gujarat. The budget, three times what Punjab and Haryana get combined, flows to a state that has never produced a medallist. Nobody asks why. The bureaucrat who could ask is a Brahmin. He does not ask. He signs.

Look at the newsroom. Who reports the news. Brahmins, mostly. Who owns the channel. A vegetarian businessman. The canteen serves no meat, no onion, no garlic, and the reporter feels pure, feels pious, feels chosen. He does not notice his salary is a fraction of the profit walking out the door in a Mercedes.

Look at the factory floor. Who builds it, who owns it. The UP Brahmin migrates to Gujarat to teach, to clerk, to supervise, proud of his vegetarian tiffin, proud of his sacred thread, unaware he has become staff in someone else's kingdom. The owner's children are in London. They eat whatever they like there. They come home twice a year, donate a percentage to the temple, and the Brahmin garlands them at the door.

This is the miracle of ahimsa, properly interpreted. You may steal from a cow, so long as you do not slaughter her. That is not violence, that is milk. You may raid a beehive and take the honey, so long as no blood is spilled. That is not violence, that is Ayurveda. By this logic you may hollow out a nation's treasury, so long as nobody's throat is cut. That is not violence either. That is business.

The Rishi once advised the Raja. That arrangement is dead. Wars are no longer won with armies, they are won with money, and money buys technology, and technology decides who appears on your voter list and who quietly disappears from it. Democracy promised that voters choose kings. Capital has quietly amended the clause.

Remember who India's first prime minister was. A Pandit. A Brahmin. And who destroyed him, slowly, patiently, across decades. Also Brahmins, cheering from the sidelines while someone else counted the profits of his fall.

The irony is old, older than the Republic. The merchant class was Jain once, Buddhist once, thrown out of the fold by Brahminical orthodoxy centuries ago. They did not forget. They waited. They rebuilt themselves as Baniya, and they have spent generations turning the very priesthood that expelled them into paid staff, garlanding their factories, blessing their gold, barking on their behalf on social media for free.

The Kshatriya, meanwhile, has no sword to raise and no war to fight, so he has nothing left to sell. Only the Brahmin still has his voice, and he has rented it out cheap, in exchange for a vegetarian canteen and the right to feel holy while someone else counts the money.

Bark on, gentlemen. The Nagpur bowl is being refilled in Ahmedabad.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Unveiling the "Real Majority" of India

Unveiling the "Real Majority": Divya Dwivedi’s Critique of the Hindu Majority Narrative * In contemporary Indian discourse, the notion of a "Hindu majority" is often taken as an unassailable fact, with official statistics frequently citing approximately 80% of India’s population as Hindu. This framing shapes political campaigns, cultural narratives, and even national identity. However, philosopher and professor at IIT Delhi, Divya Dwivedi, challenges this narrative in her provocative and incisive work, arguing that the "Hindu majority" is a constructed myth that obscures the true social composition of India. For Dwivedi, the "real majority" comprises the lower-caste communities—historically marginalized and oppressed under the caste system—who form the numerical and social backbone of the nation. Her critique, developed in collaboration with philosopher Shaj Mohan, offers a radical rethinking of Indian society, exposing the mechanisms of power t...

Nehru: Past, Present, and Future

  Based on a speech/talk in Telugu by Dr. Devaraju Maharaju  Some people say Nehru belongs to the past. Personally, I believe he belongs not only to the past but to the present and the future as well. Building a nation requires immense effort and sacrifice — and Nehru demonstrated both through his life. His life stands as an ideal not just for the older generation, but for today's youth and generations yet to come. I hold this belief firmly. He was a visionary, an atheist, a rationalist — but setting all of that aside, there is one thing that must be spoken of without fail: Scientific Temper . The man who coined the term "scientific temper" and gave it to the world was Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru. This phrase is now used globally, and people must remember that it was Nehru who gave us those words. The Roots of Scientific Thought in India Did scientific temper begin with Nehru? Not quite. India was actually home to the world's earliest materialists. It was India tha...

THE DRAVIDIAN PEOPLE OF SOUTH ASIA

Dravidians are the most ancient ethno-linguistic group of South Asia. The migrations of the Indo-Aryans pushed them deeper into the subcontinent. But a few isolated groups still remain to tell the tale. They may not have the Ancestral South Indian (ASI) of most of the Dravidian people, but the Brahui language still spoken in Balochistan in the areas around Quetta, is tell tale evidence of our history.  The Brahui is an ethnic group residing in Balochistan and Sindh, in Pakistan. Their distant linguistic cousins reside in the states of Karnataka and Kerala, Tamil Nadu and Telangana in India.  The Brahui are an excellent example of this phenomenon. A Dravidian ethnic group residing in the deserts of Sindh and Balochistan in Pakistan, they share DNA with their Sindhi, Balochi and provincial neighbours of different ethnicities. But their nearest cousins are located in the states of Karnataka in India. Causal relationships between ethnic groups in the Indian Subcontinen...